Court Ruling Strikes Down Trump Administration Tariffs as Unlawful

Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown has announced a significant court victory in challenging tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. A federal court has ruled that these tariffs, which have been increasing prices for American consumers and businesses, are not legally authorized. The U.S. Court of International Trade granted summary judgment in favor of a coalition of 24 states, invalidating the administration’s recent actions to levy duties on a wide range of products. While this specific ruling does not offer direct financial relief to Maryland or its residents, it establishes a precedent that could pave the way for future legal challenges against what the state deems unlawful trade policies.

The legal battle began as the Trump administration sought to impose tariffs on essential goods. Initially, the administration invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, but this approach was ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court. Following that decision, the administration attempted to use Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a provision that had not previously been utilized for such purposes. Under this new authority, a 10 percent tariff was applied to most products globally, with the stated justification of addressing trade deficits.

However, the U.S. Court of International Trade found these tariffs to be unlawful. The court determined that Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 permits tariffs only in instances of “large and serious balance-of-payment deficits.” The court’s decision highlighted that a trade deficit is distinct from a balance-of-payment deficit, and therefore, the conditions required to implement tariffs under this section were not met. Consequently, the court declared the administration’s proclamation for these tariffs to be invalid.

The coalition that brought this lawsuit included the attorneys general from numerous states, in addition to Maryland. Participating states were Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. The governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania also joined in the legal challenge.

This court decision represents a crucial step in the ongoing effort to ensure that American consumers and businesses are not burdened by what the state attorneys general argue are unlawful and costly trade policies. The ruling is seen as a win for those advocating for adherence to legal frameworks in international trade and for protecting the American economy from what they describe as chaotic and unauthorized tariff implementations.

Article by Mel Anara, based upon information from the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.

---