Maryland’s 2035 Electric Car Mandate Raises Concerns for Rural Areas

HAGERSTOWN, MD News (9/23/2023) – As Maryland’s ambitious plan to mandate electric vehicles (EVs) by 2035 moves forward, growing concerns are emerging about the potential repercussions for the state’s rural communities. While the shift toward electric cars is lauded as a step toward a more sustainable future, it may inadvertently leave the more remote parts of Maryland in the dark, restricting their transportation options and impacting local businesses and residents.

The 2035 Mandate and the Rural Challenge

In March of this year, Governor Wes Moore announced Maryland’s commitment to an aggressive climate goal: requiring all new car sales in the state to be electric vehicles by 2035. This forward-thinking policy aims to reduce carbon emissions and promote cleaner transportation options. However, as the transition unfolds, it is raising serious concerns regarding its impact on rural areas, particularly those in western Maryland.

Limited Charging Infrastructure in Rural Areas

One of the most pressing challenges facing rural areas is the limited charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Unlike urban and suburban regions, rural parts of Maryland often lack the extensive network of charging stations required to support a widespread shift to electric cars. Residents and businesses in these areas may find it difficult to access charging facilities, leading to “range anxiety” and potentially discouraging the adoption of EVs.

Impact on Existing Gas Vehicle Inventory

As the state pivots toward electric vehicles, the availability of traditional gas-powered cars is expected to decline. This could pose a significant challenge for rural residents who rely on these vehicles for their transportation needs. Many people in remote areas may require rugged vehicles capable of handling challenging terrains, which may not yet have electric equivalents. Additionally, electric vehicles are much more expensive to purchase and maintain, further hurting economically disadvantaged in rural areas. The reduction in available gas-powered options could lead to higher prices and limited choices for these residents.

Transportation Disparities Exacerbated by Limited Public Transit

While the transition to electric vehicles is a critical aspect of Maryland’s sustainability goals, another challenge facing rural residents is the limited access to public transportation options. For example, in Washington County, part of western Maryland, public transportation options to neighboring areas are exceptionally scarce. As of this article, only the MTA 505 bus provides public transportation out of and into Washington County. To add to the challenge, this bus route doesn’t even include a stop in Frederick, a city that is a significant commuting destination for many Washington County residents.

The Washington County – Frederick Commute

Despite the limited public transportation options, many Washington County residents rely on commuting to Frederick for work, with the number of daily commuters far exceeding those heading to Washington, D.C. The absence of convenient and accessible public transit between these two areas poses a significant challenge to residents who seek reliable and affordable commuting solutions.

Financial Constraints and Range Limitations

Driving across the state often exceeds the maximum range of the average electric vehicle, making EVs simply unfeasible for many rural Marylanders. For these residents, electric vehicles are not an option until they have significantly improved range capabilities. Additionally, the cost of electric vehicles remains a significant barrier. Many rural Maryland residents simply can’t afford even used electric vehicles, which often cost more than their homes.

MTA’s Focus on DC Metro Over Washington County and Frederick

One of the points of contention in the transportation landscape is the apparent prioritization of the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) in providing bus service from Washington County to the Washington, D.C., Metro area over Frederick. While the D.C. Metro area is undoubtedly a significant employment hub for many Maryland residents, the focus on this region has left Frederick commuters underserved.

Addressing Transportation Disparities in Rural Maryland

Maryland focusing on expensive electric vehicles instead of increasing access to public transportation is extremely short-sighted.

Maryland should strongly consider prioritizing the expansion and improvement of public transportation options in underserved rural areas, including more frequent and convenient routes connecting areas like Washington County and Frederick. Additionally, reassess transportation priorities to ensure that the unique needs of rural Marylanders are met. This means evaluating commuter patterns and addressing the transportation challenges faced by those who travel to regional job centers like Frederick.

In conclusion, while Maryland’s commitment to electric vehicles is a commendable step toward a greener future, the state must not forget its rural communities. Addressing the transportation needs of all residents, regardless of their location, is crucial to ensuring equitable and sustainable mobility throughout the state.

Article by multiple RFHC contributors.