Due to multiple factors we’ve made some changes to how visitors can access our content. Please click here to learn more.
Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown announced that a federal court has issued a preliminary injunction, stopping the Trump administration from enforcing a provision that would have diverted federal Medicaid reimbursements from certain health centers, including those operated by Planned Parenthood. The ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts prevents the enforcement of what is referred to as the “Defund Provision” within a recently passed federal budget bill. This provision would have excluded these health centers from receiving crucial federal funding, impacting their ability to provide essential healthcare services to low-income populations.
Article continues after these messages…
In a time where local news media coverage seems to be disappearing, your contribution is more important than ever. While our in-depth articles are for supporting members only, we won’t put our core news content behind a paywall, because we believe access to news should be democratized, instead of access for only those who can afford it.
But keeping the lights on and taking the fight to local accountability takes resources. Your monthly subscription directly funds our public records requests, website hosting, and time spent analyzing local government and events so you don’t have to.
We are the only newsroom in Washington County with facts-first focus, locally owned, independent, while keeping our core news content free. Will you help us keep it that way?
The lawsuit, which Attorney General Brown joined on July 29, was filed as part of a coalition of 22 state attorneys general and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The group argued that the Defund Provision was unconstitutional and would cause significant harm. On September 24, the coalition formally requested a preliminary injunction to halt the provision’s implementation. The court’s decision affirmed the likelihood that the states will prevail in their case. The court found that the Defund Provision lacked sufficient clarity regarding which providers would be classified as “prohibited entities,” a requirement under the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, the court determined that the provision acted as an unlawful retroactive change to Medicaid, imposing a condition that states could not have reasonably anticipated when agreeing to participate in the program.
The court’s ruling also emphasized the irreparable harm that would result if the Defund Provision were allowed to take effect. It determined that the balance of equities and the public interest overwhelmingly favored the states in preventing the funding cuts. The health centers affected by this provision offer a range of vital services, including cancer screenings, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, and access to birth control. The preliminary injunction ensures that these services can continue to be provided without interruption to those who rely on them for their health and well-being. The lawsuit was supported by the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, along with the Governor of Pennsylvania.
Article by Mel Anara, based upon information from the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.
Do you believe we got something wrong? Please read our publishing standards and corrections policy.
Video Spotlight
Did you know? Supporters get a reduced ad experience!
Sponsored Articles
Get daily and breaking news for Washington County, MD area from Radio Free Hub City. Sign up with your email today!
Paid supporters have a reduced ad experience!
Discover more from Radio Free Hub City
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


