Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown has joined a coalition of 23 other state attorneys general in submitting a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court. The filing supports the independence of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and opposes a request from President Trump to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The attorneys general argue that allowing such a dismissal would compromise the Federal Reserve’s crucial ability to make economic decisions free from political influence, thereby jeopardizing economic stability.
Article continues after these messages…
While other outlets focus on getting quotes from politicians who don't even live in our congressional district, we're focused on providing the hard-hitting truths and facts without political spin. We don't lock our news behind a paywall, will you help us keep it that way? If you're tired of news sweetened with confirmation bias, consider becoming a monthly supporter. But if you're not, that's fine too—we're confident in our mission and will be here if you decide you're ready for the truth. Just $5/month helps fund our local reporting, live election night coverage, and more.
Become a paid supporter for reduced ad experience!
The legal challenge, Trump v. Cook, centers on whether the president has the authority to dismiss a member of the Federal Reserve’s governing board without due process. The attorneys general’s brief contends that an independent Federal Reserve is vital for maintaining economic stability by insulating monetary policy from the fluctuations of political agendas. Experts, including former Federal Reserve leaders and prominent economists, have cautioned that undermining the institution’s independence could lead to increased inflation, heightened market volatility, and long-term financial instability.
For Maryland and other states, a stable economic outlook is essential for effective planning of state budgets, allocation of funds for schools, and the provision of necessary public services. Any disruption to the Federal Reserve’s independence could complicate these efforts and potentially increase costs for taxpayers. The coalition’s filing also asserts that no individual, including the president, is exempt from legal constraints and that Congress, rather than the White House, defines the parameters of presidential authority over independent federal agencies.
The case brought before the Supreme Court by President Trump seeks to enable his removal of Governor Lisa Cook based on disputed allegations. A lower court had previously blocked this removal while the legal proceedings continue. The brief submitted by the state attorneys general urges the Supreme Court to uphold the lower court’s decision and preserve the Federal Reserve’s independence, in accordance with the intent of Congress. The states joining Maryland in this amicus brief include Arizona, California, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Article by Mel Anara, based upon information from the Maryland Attorney General.
Do you believe we got something wrong? Please read our publishing standards and corrections policy.
Did you know? Supporters get a reduced ad experience!
Sponsored Articles
Get daily and breaking news for Washington County, MD area from Radio Free Hub City. Sign up with your email today!
Paid supporters have a reduced ad experience!
Discover more from Radio Free Hub City
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.












