Maryland Attorney General Anthony G. Brown has joined a coalition of 18 state attorneys general and agencies in voicing strong opposition to the proposed federal Securing and Establishing Consumer Uniform Rights and Enforcement over Data Act, or SECURE Data Act. This federal legislation, if enacted, would preempt robust privacy protections already established by Maryland and other states, potentially weakening safeguards for consumers’ personal information. The coalition argues that the SECURE Data Act offers insufficient privacy protections and would hinder states’ ability to protect their residents’ data.
Article continues after these messages…
We didn't pick our name by accident. While other outlets are proud to be government 'Partners,' we are proud to be exactly what our namesake requires: Free from government influence, and free from government censorship. We don't lock our news behind a paywall, will you help us keep it that way? If you're tired of news sweetened with confirmation bias that never questions the 'official story', consider becoming a monthly supporter. Just $5/month helps fund our local reporting, live election night coverage, and more.
The core concern raised by Attorney General Brown and the coalition is that the SECURE Data Act would override existing state-level privacy laws, including Maryland’s own Online Data Privacy Act. These state laws have implemented significant consumer protections, such as enhanced safeguards for minors and sensitive personal data, limitations on data usage and retention, and mechanisms for consumers to opt out of the sale of their information through universal preference signals. The federal bill, as proposed, is seen as a step backward, potentially granting businesses more latitude in handling consumer data while diminishing consumers’ ability to control their information and limiting enforcement options for state officials.
The coalition’s letter to Congress urges lawmakers to reject the SECURE Data Act and to uphold the privacy standards already set by states. They contend that states are better positioned to address the specific privacy needs of their residents and to adapt quickly to the ever-evolving landscape of technology and data collection practices. The attorneys general involved represent a broad range of states, underscoring a widespread sentiment among state leaders that a federal privacy framework should complement, rather than dismantle, existing state-level consumer protection efforts. Maryland residents, in particular, could see their current data privacy rights curtailed if this federal legislation were to pass without significant amendments to preserve state authority.
Article by Mel Anara, based upon information from the Maryland Attorney General’s Office
Do you believe we got something wrong? Please read our publishing standards and corrections policy.
Video Spotlight
Did you know? Supporters get a reduced ad experience!
Sponsored Articles
Get daily and breaking news for Washington County, MD area from Radio Free Hub City. Sign up with your email today!
Paid supporters have a reduced ad experience!
Discover more from Radio Free Hub City
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




