Due to multiple factors including content scraping and copyright infringement, Radio Free Hub City must now lock some of our more in-depth reporting behind a paywall, and many other articles will now require a free account to signup. Please click here to learn more.
A recent ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has allowed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to proceed with the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from Honduras, Nicaragua, and Nepal. This decision marks a significant legal development in the administration’s efforts to alter the application of TPS.
Article continues after these messages…
In a time where local news media coverage seems to be disappearing, your contribution is more important than ever. While our in-depth articles are for supporting members only, we won’t put our core news content behind a paywall, because we believe access to news should be democratized, instead of access for only those who can afford it.
But keeping the lights on and taking the fight to local accountability takes resources. Your monthly subscription directly funds our public records requests, website hosting, and time spent analyzing local government and events so you don’t have to.
We are the only newsroom in Washington County with facts-first focus, locally owned, independent, while keeping our core news content free. Will you help us keep it that way?
The appeals court granted the administration’s request for a stay, which permits the termination of TPS for these three countries to move forward while a broader appeal of the initial lawsuit is considered. The legal challenge originated from the National TPS Alliance and concerned decisions made by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem regarding the termination of TPS for nationals of Honduras, Nicaragua, and Nepal. The court’s unanimous decision by a three-judge panel is being viewed as a validation of the administration’s stance on the intended purpose of TPS.
The rationale behind the administration’s action, as stated by Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, is that TPS was designed to be a temporary measure, not a permanent pathway to residency or a substitute for the asylum process. The administration contends that previous administrations had expanded the use of TPS beyond its original intent, leading to the presence of a large number of individuals in the United States who had not undergone the standard vetting procedures associated with other immigration pathways. This court ruling is seen by the DHS as a step towards reinstating what they consider to be greater integrity within the U.S. immigration system, with an ultimate goal of enhancing national security and public safety.
Article by Mel Anara, based upon information from the Department of Homeland Security.
Do you believe we got something wrong? Please read our publishing standards and corrections policy.
Video Spotlight
Did you know? Supporters get a reduced ad experience!
Sponsored Articles
Get daily and breaking news for Washington County, MD area from Radio Free Hub City. Sign up with your email today!
Paid supporters have a reduced ad experience!
Discover more from Radio Free Hub City
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


