The Other Epstein Files: Non-DOJ Documents Provide Details of Epstein’s Travels, Corporate Ties, and Election Integrity Concerns

A collection of documents recently located by Radio Free Hub City, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) travel records, a corporate governance filing concerning Microsoft, and public testimony submitted to the Hawaii Elections Commission, sheds new light on the activities and associations of Jeffrey Epstein. These primary source materials trace Epstein’s movements, identify key associates, and illustrate the ripple effects of his network on both corporate and governmental institutions. The findings suggest a complex web of connections that extend beyond the widely publicized Department of Justice releases.

The most substantial portion of the newly released files comprises official travel logs from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and CBP. These records meticulously document the itineraries of Epstein’s private aircraft, specifically noting three registered tail numbers: N908JE, a Boeing 727 often referred to as the “Lolita Express”; N909JE, a Gulfstream; and N212JE, another Gulfstream. The logs detail frequent travel patterns, with St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands serving as a primary international hub. Other recurring destinations include Teterboro, New Jersey, a significant domestic point of departure and arrival, and Palm Beach, Florida, an area associated with one of Epstein’s residences. International travel also frequently targeted airports in Paris, France, such as Le Bourget, Orly, and Charles de Gaulle.

These CBP and DHS records extend to passenger and crew information, often logged through “Advance Traveler Information” and “Report of Private Aircraft Arrival” forms. Jeffrey Epstein is consistently identified as a passenger, with his date of birth and passport numbers recorded. While most other passenger names are heavily redacted, citing privacy exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), details such as passenger gender and, in some instances, dates of birth, remain visible. The redactions obscure the identities of many individuals who traveled with Epstein, though the dates of these flights correlate with known periods of his illicit activities. Some records also reference “TECSII Primary Query History,” indicating checks conducted by border agents to determine admissibility into the United States.

In addition to travel data, a corporate governance filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reveals concerns raised by the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) regarding Microsoft’s board of directors. Filed in May 2023, the notice urged Microsoft shareholders to vote against the re-election of Reid Hoffman. The NLPC’s argument centered on the contention that Hoffman’s judgment was compromised due to his close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The filing specifically highlighted Hoffman’s role in facilitating donations from Epstein to the MIT Media Lab, noting that Epstein’s contributions were kept anonymous due to his status as a “disqualified” donor. Furthermore, the document mentioned an admission by Hoffman that he had visited Epstein’s private island on a “fundraising trip.” The NLPC also alleged that Hoffman had invited Epstein to dinners with other prominent figures in the tech industry and had assisted in rehabilitating Epstein’s public image following his 2008 conviction. The filing characterized these associations as significant reputational liabilities for Microsoft, particularly in light of Hoffman’s public activism.

The third category of documents comprises a supplemental meeting packet for the Hawaii Elections Commission. While the packet primarily addresses local election administration matters, such as ballot chain of custody and reported discrepancies in Kauai County, it includes testimony that draws a connection to Epstein. A submitter, identifying as “Master Shelby ‘Pikachu’ Billionaire,” provided written testimony asserting that the declassified “Epstein files” expose a network of compromised federal officials and elites. This testimony posited that if federal officials, including those within the Department of Justice, are susceptible to blackmail due to their Epstein-related connections, then their oversight of Hawaii’s elections, potentially through federal funding or the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), cannot be considered trustworthy. Consequently, the testimony called for the Hawaii Elections Commission to investigate the potential impact of the “Epstein network’s influence” on election security within the state and to review relevant Epstein-related documentation.

These varied documents offers a multi-faceted perspective on the enduring impact of Jeffrey Epstein’s network, extending beyond the immediate focus on his criminal activities to encompass corporate governance and the integrity of electoral processes. We will release additional documents as we locate them.

Article by Ken Buckler, based upon information from CBP, SEC, MIT, and the State of Hawaii.

---